← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Duderstadt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-10-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Pittsburgh Vengeance USPHL-Premier 42 7 9 16 0.381 0.0430 0.0453 0.1296 0.1365
2019-20 Pittsburgh Vengeance USPHL-Premier 43 7 27 34 0.791 0.0892 0.0892 0.2690 0.2690
2020-21 Seahawks Hockey EHL 32 3 12 15 0.469 0.0686 0.0686 0.2299 0.2299
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Rivier D3 MASCAC SR 24 1 9 10 0.417
2023-24 Rivier D3 MASCAC JR 25 3 9 12 0.480
2022-23 Rivier D3 MASCAC SO 23 1 4 5 0.217
2021-22 Rivier D3 MASCAC FR 13 2 6 8 0.615
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2021-22 · Rivier
+1337.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
95%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7494
Defenseman overall
#1495
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2007-08
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2011-12
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2017-18
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.