← New Search ↗ Social Card

Graeme McCrory Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-07-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Wellington Dukes OJHL 52 2 10 12 0.231 0.0566 0.0608 0.1580 0.1696
2018-19 Milton Menace OJHL 53 8 14 22 0.415 0.1017 0.1042 0.2841 0.2911
2019-20 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 52 10 26 36 0.692 0.1697 0.1697 0.4739 0.4739
2020-21 Timmins Rock NOJHL 10 3 5 8 0.800 0.1139 0.1139 0.3319 0.3319
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Stevenson D3 MAC SR 28 9 9 18 0.643
2023-24 Stevenson D3 MAC JR 27 5 4 9 0.333
2022-23 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 27 4 6 10 0.370
2021-22 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 26 1 7 8 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2021-22 · Stevenson
+314.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31140
Forward overall
#1555
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Boston University (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2001-02
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2015-16
0.619 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Roger Williams · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.