← New Search ↗ Social Card

Peyton Hughes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-10-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Detroit Fighting Irish USPHL-Premier 41 34 24 58 1.415 0.1856 0.2052 0.4803 0.5309
2018-19 Renfrew Wolves CCHL 28 3 1 4 0.143 0.0310 0.0324 0.1095 0.1144
2019-20 L/A Nordiques NA3HL 31 20 31 51 1.645 0.2096 0.2096 0.5204 0.5204
2020-21 Bridgewater Jr. Bandits USPHL-Premier 26 9 18 27 1.038 0.1363 0.1363 0.3526 0.3526
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Salem State D3 MASCAC SR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Salem State D3 MASCAC JR 24 2 3 5 0.208
2022-23 Salem State D3 MASCAC SO 27 3 3 6 0.222
2021-22 Salem State D3 MASCAC FR 25 1 2 3 0.120
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2021-22 · Salem State
+38.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17849
Forward overall
#802
Forward born in 2000
#1092
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connecticut College · 2009-10
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2010-11
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Morrisville · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.