IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Hertzberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-01-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Pittsburgh Vengeance USPHL-Premier 37 9 12 21 0.568 0.0640 0.0648 0.1931 0.1955
2019-20 New Jersey 87's EHL 25 3 6 9 0.360 0.0527 0.0527 0.1765 0.1765
2020-21 New Jersey 87's EHL 32 9 11 20 0.625 0.0914 0.0914 0.3064 0.3064
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Arcadia D3 MAC SR 23 3 6 9 0.391
2023-24 Arcadia D3 MAC JR 19 0 4 4 0.210
2022-23 Arcadia D3 MAC SO 23 2 4 6 0.261
2021-22 Arcadia D3 MAC FR 14 0 3 3 0.214
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2021-22 · Arcadia
+286.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
62%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30874
Forward overall
#1537
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mark Leach
Saint Anselm · 2017-18
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tristan Simm
Chatham · 2015-16
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Colin Biebel
St. Michael's College · 2013-14
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.