IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mark Leach Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-12-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 49 0 7 7 0.143 0.0508 0.0543 0.1507 0.1610
2017-18 — NAHL 16 0 1 1 0.062 0.0222 0.0226 0.0659 0.0671
2018-19 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 52 0 4 4 0.077 0.0273 0.0266 0.0811 0.0790
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 SR 33 2 8 10 0.303
2021-22 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 JR 27 3 7 10 0.370
2020-21 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Saint Anselm D1 NE10 FR 14 0 6 6 0.429
2019-20 Saint Anselm D2 NE10 FR 14 0 6 6 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2019-20 · Saint Anselm
+1716.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20518
Defenseman overall
#2828
Defenseman born in 1998
#5856
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Spencer Kimball
Amherst · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Parsells
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2016-17
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryan Carter
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.