IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Kimball Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-01-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Minot Minotauros NAHL 36 0 5 5 0.139 0.0494 0.0504 0.1465 0.1494
2018-19 — NAHL 51 1 9 10 0.196 0.0697 0.0680 0.2068 0.2016
2019-20 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 45 1 2 3 0.067 0.0237 0.0237 0.0704 0.0704
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Amherst D3 NESCAC SR 25 1 3 4 0.160
2022-23 Amherst D3 NESCAC JR 25 1 2 3 0.120
2021-22 Amherst D3 NESCAC SO 22 0 1 1 0.045
2020-21 Amherst D3 NESCAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26285
Defenseman overall
#3549
Defenseman born in 1999
#6636
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

August Bouveng
Anna Maria · 2018-19
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Chase Wiedemann
Lawrence · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Cam Russo
Colby · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.