← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Parsells Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-01-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 USHL 56 4 9 13 0.232 0.1369 0.1354 0.6949 0.6871
2016-17 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 40 1 5 6 0.150 0.0885 0.0830 0.4491 0.4211
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D1 BigTen SR 8 2 6 8 1.000
2020-21 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SR 8 2 6 8 1.000
2019-20 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D1 BigTen JR 28 8 16 24 0.857
2019-20 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen JR 28 8 16 24 0.857
2018-19 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D1 BigTen SO 28 7 6 13 0.464
2018-19 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen SO 28 7 6 13 0.464
2017-18 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 BigTen FR 24 3 10 13 0.542
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2017-18 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+452.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15119
Defenseman overall
#2181
Defenseman born in 1997
#3709
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hamline · 2016-17
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2003-04
0.619 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.