← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Dickson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-08-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Timmins Rock NOJHL 52 14 17 31 0.596 0.0849 0.0879 0.2474 0.2561
2019-20 Timmins Rock NOJHL 55 26 31 57 1.036 0.1476 0.1476 0.4300 0.4300
2020-21 Timmins Rock NOJHL 22 13 19 32 1.454 0.2071 0.2071 0.6035 0.6035
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Nichols D3 CNE SR 26 8 9 17 0.654
2023-24 Nichols D3 CNE JR 23 4 7 11 0.478
2022-23 Nichols D3 CNE SO 25 7 5 12 0.480
2021-22 Nichols D3 CNE FR 13 1 1 2 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2021-22 · Nichols
+104.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19020
Forward overall
#843
Forward born in 2000
#100
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia (WI) · 2015-16
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Middlebury · 2016-17
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.