← New Search ↗ Social Card

MacCallum Brown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-08-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Florida Jr. Blades USPHL-Premier 2 0 2 2 1.000 0.1128 0.1236 0.3402 0.3726
2018-19 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 29 4 3 7 0.241 0.0353 0.0375 0.1184 0.1258
2019-20 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 37 1 3 4 0.108 0.0158 0.0158 0.0530 0.0530
2020-21 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 33 1 9 10 0.303 0.0443 0.0443 0.1486 0.1486
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Rivier D3 MASCAC SR 9 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Rivier D3 MASCAC JR 16 0 2 2 0.125
2022-23 Rivier D3 MASCAC SO 23 0 1 1 0.043
2021-22 Rivier D3 MASCAC FR 13 0 1 1 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2021-22 · Rivier
+13.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
88%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20346
Defenseman overall
#3019
Defenseman born in 2000

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Geneseo · 2009-10
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.