IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eyan Gonzalves-Helm Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-03-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 New Jersey Renegades EHLP 8 9 4 13 1.625 0.1864 0.1821 0.3663 0.3578
2019-20 — NA3HL 23 13 12 25 1.087 0.1364 0.1364 0.3432 0.3432
2020-21 New Jersey Jr. Titans NA3HL 29 11 9 20 0.690 0.0866 0.0866 0.2177 0.2177
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Rivier D3 MASCAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
80%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28989
Forward overall
#1432
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy DeVito
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mackenzie MacEachern
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Benjamin Meisinger
Framingham State · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nate Ryan
St. Thomas · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryan Yim
Adrian · 2012-13
1.138 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.