IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryan Rufenach Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1989-04-15 Country: Canada
2007 · Round 7, Pick #208  ·  Detroit Red Wings Detroit Red Wings
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 48 11 15 26 0.542 0.1328 0.1462 0.3730 0.4105
2006-07 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 31 11 21 32 1.032 0.2530 0.2658 0.7107 0.7466
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Clarkson D1 ECAC SR 33 4 7 11 0.333
2009-10 Clarkson D1 ECAC JR 34 5 15 20 0.588
2008-09 Clarkson D1 ECAC SO 34 9 9 18 0.529
2007-08 Clarkson D1 ECAC FR 35 3 3 6 0.171
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2007-08 · Clarkson
-16.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4601
Defenseman overall
#724
Defenseman born in 1989
#891
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Luke Voltin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Clifton
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Murphy
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Northland (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Gross
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Downing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Michigan (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Ellis
SUNY Oswego · 2001-02
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Kielich
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Hawkrigg
Trinity · 2009-10
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.