IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Krawczyk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Buffalo Thunder USPHL-Premier 5 2 1 3 0.600 0.0677 0.0731 0.2037 0.2199
2020-21 Protec Jr. Ducks EHL 19 2 4 6 0.316 0.0462 0.0462 0.1547 0.1547
2021-22 Markham Royals OJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1226 0.1126 0.3438 0.3158
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 King's D3 MAC GR 20 6 3 9 0.450
2023-24 King's D3 MAC SR 26 3 2 5 0.192
2022-23 King's D3 MAC JR 16 2 3 5 0.312
2021-22 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC — 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24435
Forward overall
#1220
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trevor Coykendall
Adrian · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hayden Ford
Buffalo State · 2017-18
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Singerhouse
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.