IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brayden Patricia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-06-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 — NCDC 30 3 9 12 0.400 0.0924 0.0961 0.3234 0.3363
2019-20 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 41 28 27 55 1.341 0.1963 0.1963 0.6577 0.6577
2020-21 — EHL 25 19 25 44 1.760 0.2575 0.2575 0.8629 0.8629
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western New England D3 CNE GR 25 6 5 11 0.440
2024-25 Western New England D3 CNE — 25 3 7 10 0.400
2023-24 Western New England D3 CNE — 19 6 6 12 0.632
2022-23 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 4 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
82%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5902
Forward overall
#236
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cullen Willox
St. Thomas · 2013-14
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Caleb Suderman
Concordia · 2007-08
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brady Peterson
Finlandia · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.