← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolan Lowe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0931 0.1001 0.2300 0.2473
2019-20 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 39 5 10 15 0.385 0.1075 0.1075 0.2654 0.2654
2020-21 Toronto Patriots OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Toronto Patriots OJHL 52 14 21 35 0.673 0.1881 0.1748 0.4645 0.4317
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 20 4 3 7 0.350
2024-25 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 23 3 8 11 0.478
2023-24 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 24 6 7 13 0.542
2022-23 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 22 5 4 9 0.409
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2022-23 · Wentworth
+229.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26806
Forward overall
#1039
Forward born in 2001
#2295
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2003-04
1.235 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2012-13
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.