← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolan Lowe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0817 0.0878 0.2295 0.2467
2019-20 Georgetown Raiders OJHL 39 5 10 15 0.385 0.0943 0.0943 0.2648 0.2648
2020-21 Toronto Patriots OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Toronto Patriots OJHL 52 14 21 35 0.673 0.1650 0.1533 0.4634 0.4306
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wentworth D3 CNE SR 20 4 3 7 0.350
2024-25 Wentworth D3 CNE JR 23 3 8 11 0.478
2023-24 Wentworth D3 CNE SO 24 6 7 13 0.542
2022-23 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 22 5 4 9 0.409
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2022-23 · Wentworth
+276.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34029
Forward overall
#1841
Forward born in 2001
#1931
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Worcester State · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2012-13
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.