← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jesse Galassi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-05-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 33 1 1 2 0.061 0.0338 0.0338 0.0490 0.0490
2021-22 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 43 5 19 24 0.558 0.3112 0.2934 0.4513 0.4255
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Curry D3 CNE SR 26 7 12 19 0.731
2024-25 Curry D3 CNE JR 19 0 5 5 0.263
2023-24 Curry D3 CNE SO 28 4 11 15 0.536
2022-23 Curry D3 CNE FR 26 2 6 8 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2022-23 · Curry
+11.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6842
Defenseman overall
#1498
Defenseman born in 2001
#960
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Skidmore · 2024-25
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2005-06
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.