IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Drummond Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-08-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 34 5 19 24 0.706 0.1033 0.1033 0.3461 0.3461
2021-22 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 44 3 20 23 0.523 0.0765 0.0749 0.2563 0.2509
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Boston D3 — SR 25 1 11 12 0.480
2024-25 UMass Boston D3 NEHC JR 14 0 4 4 0.286
2023-24 Curry D3 CNE — 17 1 2 3 0.176
2022-23 Curry D3 CNE — 28 0 6 6 0.214
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2022-23 · Curry
+203.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6030
Defenseman overall
#1361
Defenseman born in 2001
#753
in EHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Egan
SUNY Cortland · 2017-18
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rich Dady
Fitchburg State · 2004-05
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Spethmann
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.