IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trenton Skaggs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-03-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Wisconsin Rapids Riverkings USPHL-Premier 42 6 42 48 1.143 0.1289 0.1289 0.3888 0.3888
2021-22 Thunder Hockey Club NCDC 32 1 5 6 0.188 0.0433 0.0426 0.1516 0.1490
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SR 26 2 10 12 0.462
2024-25 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC JR 26 2 9 11 0.423
2023-24 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SO 27 1 5 6 0.222
2022-23 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC FR 23 0 5 5 0.217
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2022-23 · Fitchburg State
+440.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5736
Defenseman overall
#1443
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ross Goff
Fitchburg State · 2002-03
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dorian Overland
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.210 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Laurila
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.