← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Glazer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Brockville Braves CCHL 4 1 0 1 0.250 0.0542 0.0589 0.1934 0.2102
2019-20 Brockville Braves CCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Hearst Lumberjacks NOJHL 18 15 5 20 1.111 0.1856 0.1721 0.4626 0.4289
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 23 6 8 14 0.609
2024-25 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC GR 23 6 8 14 0.609
2023-24 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC 17 1 2 3 0.176
2023-24 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SR 17 1 2 3 0.176
2022-23 SUNY Morrisville D3 SUNYAC JR 13 2 2 4 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2022-23 · SUNY Morrisville
+183.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19779
Forward overall
#945
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Plymouth State · 2021-22
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2016-17
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2015-16
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.