← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexander Muthersbaugh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-08-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 18 0 5 5 0.278 0.0642 0.0642 0.1359 0.1359
2021-22 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 37 2 8 10 0.270 0.0624 0.0610 0.1323 0.1293
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Keene State D3 LittleEast SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 GR 8 1 1 2 0.250
2023-24 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 SR 29 3 8 11 0.379
2022-23 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 JR 14 2 2 4 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2022-23 · Southern New Hampshire
+396.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17890
Defenseman overall
#2826
Defenseman born in 2001
#2195
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2006-07
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2018-19
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Misericordia · 2023-24
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.