IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bradey Farrell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-04-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 16 0 1 1 0.062 0.0144 0.0156 0.0505 0.0546
2019-20 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 50 0 5 5 0.100 0.0231 0.0231 0.0809 0.0809
2020-21 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 37 0 5 5 0.135 0.0312 0.0312 0.1092 0.1092
2021-22 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 45 0 3 3 0.067 0.0154 0.0144 0.0539 0.0504
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 25 0 5 5 0.200
2024-25 Salve Regina D3 CNE — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Salve Regina D3 CNE — 17 0 1 1 0.059
2022-23 Albertus Magnus D3 UCHC — 24 1 3 4 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.01
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2022-23 · Albertus Magnus
+1090.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25343
Defenseman overall
#3528
Defenseman born in 2001
#1736
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Conway
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2005-06
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Gagnon
St. Scholastica · 2005-06
0.091 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Nickels
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2017-18
0.208 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.