← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Hullaby Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Minnesota Mullets USPHL-Premier 35 2 4 6 0.171 0.0224 0.0259 0.0582 0.0672
2018-19 Minnesota Mullets USPHL-Premier 42 12 15 27 0.643 0.0841 0.0926 0.2182 0.2402
2019-20 Minnesota Mullets USPHL-Premier 4 1 1 2 0.500 0.0654 0.0654 0.1697 0.1697
2020-21 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 43 13 12 25 0.581 0.0760 0.0760 0.1973 0.1973
2021-22 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 42 16 15 31 0.738 0.0965 0.0921 0.2505 0.2390
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Southern Maine D3 NEHC FR 23 3 0 3 0.130
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2022-23 · Southern Maine
+65.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25502
Forward overall
#1290
Forward born in 2001
#1845
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hobart · 2021-22
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2024-25
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.