IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noel Rahn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-10-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Holy Family USHS-MN 26 2 13 15 0.577 0.1553 0.1553 0.1401 0.1401
2020-21 Holy Family USHS-MN 16 0 9 9 0.562 0.1514 0.1514 0.1366 0.1366
2021-22 — NA3HL 32 1 16 17 0.531 0.0640 0.0639 0.1678 0.1675
2022-23 Northwest Express USPHL-Premier 37 3 19 22 0.595 0.0800 0.0764 0.2024 0.1932
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Saint John's D3 MIAC FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13571
Defenseman overall
#1929
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Garret Peterson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Army (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Frank Zuccaro
Westfield State · 2010-11
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
David Larson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2006-07
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kendall Bolen-Porter
Finlandia · 2014-15
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.