IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Everest Schneider Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Elite 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0400 0.0400 0.0765 0.0765
2020-21 New Jersey 87's EHL 27 4 7 11 0.407 0.0874 0.0874 0.1995 0.1995
2021-22 New Jersey 87's EHL 25 7 10 17 0.680 0.1459 0.1382 0.3330 0.3154
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western New England D3 CNE SR 25 5 6 11 0.440
2024-25 Western New England D3 CNE JR 25 6 7 13 0.520
2023-24 Western New England D3 CNE SO 25 3 4 7 0.280
2022-23 Western New England D3 CNE FR 19 2 1 3 0.158
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2022-23 · Western New England
+33.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33136
Forward overall
#1381
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carmine Alberga
Nazareth · 2017-18
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryce Dale
Utica · 2004-05
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Benshadle
Trinity · 2016-17
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.