IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Douglas McGuire Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-11-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Wyoming Seminary NE-Prep 9 0 1 1 0.111 0.0213 0.0213 0.0506 0.0506
2019-20 Wyoming Seminary NE-Prep 20 0 1 1 0.050 0.0096 0.0096 0.0228 0.0228
2021-22 — EHL 32 3 8 11 0.344 0.0503 0.0499 0.1684 0.1672
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SR 30 6 15 21 0.700
2024-25 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 JR 26 1 9 10 0.385
2023-24 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SO 28 2 11 13 0.464
2022-23 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 FR 30 1 2 3 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2022-23 · Franklin Pierce
+213.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20953
Defenseman overall
#3106
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Fouts
New England College · 2000-01
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Kippenhan
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Granville
Buffalo State · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.