IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Parker Chadwell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-09-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Tampa Bay Juniors USPHL-Elite 43 5 22 27 0.628 0.0468 0.0493 0.1439 0.1515
2019-20 Tampa Bay Juniors USPHL-Premier 41 2 7 9 0.220 0.0248 0.0248 0.0747 0.0747
2020-21 Tampa Bay Juniors USPHL-Premier 39 1 8 9 0.231 0.0260 0.0260 0.0785 0.0785
2021-22 Tampa Bay Juniors USPHL-Premier 44 4 16 20 0.455 0.0513 0.0487 0.1546 0.1469
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 22 0 1 1 0.045
2024-25 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 25 2 4 6 0.240
2023-24 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 8 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 4 1 0 1 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2022-23 · Manhattanville
+441.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15650
Defenseman overall
#2596
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carmine Totillo
Western New England · 2014-15
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Cory Baldwin
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2005-06
0.207 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dillon Schmidt
Fredonia · 2022-23
0.208 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.