← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Zukowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-08-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 28 5 12 17 0.607 0.1402 0.1402 0.2971 0.2971
2021-22 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 38 11 19 30 0.789 0.1824 0.1786 0.3863 0.3782
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 22 2 7 9 0.409
2024-25 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 22 2 7 9 0.409
2023-24 Lawrence D3 NCHA 2 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 22 2 7 9 0.409
2022-23 Lawrence D3 NCHA 17 1 0 1 0.059
2022-23 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 22 2 7 9 0.409
2021-22 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 22 2 7 9 0.409
2020-21 University of North Carolina ACHA_D1 22 2 7 9 0.409

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21527
Forward overall
#1058
Forward born in 2001
#487
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2021-22
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2017-18
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2021-22
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.