IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sebastian Rominiecki Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-11-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHLP 41 1 10 11 0.268 0.0308 0.0326 0.0605 0.0641
2019-20 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHLP 41 6 21 27 0.658 0.0755 0.0755 0.1484 0.1484
2020-21 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 29 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 42 2 8 10 0.238 0.0550 0.0545 0.1165 0.1154
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Rivier D3 MASCAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23005
Defenseman overall
#3303
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mikhail Bushinski
Utica · 2012-13
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
T.J. Murphy
Rivier · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Carson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.