IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vladimir Fadeyev Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-04-27 Country: Russia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Minnesota Outlaws USPHL-Premier 42 19 16 35 0.833 0.0940 0.0966 0.2835 0.2915
2019-20 Minnesota Outlaws USPHL-Premier 38 23 23 46 1.210 0.1365 0.1365 0.4118 0.4118
2020-21 Northwest Express USPHL-Premier 34 16 17 33 0.971 0.1095 0.1095 0.3302 0.3302
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 20 3 1 4 0.200
2024-25 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 6 0 1 1 0.167
2023-24 Lawrence D3 NCHA SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Lawrence D3 NCHA FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
82%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12723
Forward overall
#524
Forward born in 2000
#697
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Fuss
New England · 2016-17
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Quigley
Southern New Hampshire · 2015-16
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Greg Kreese
Marian · 2001-02
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.