← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josef Vyvial Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-08-09 Country: Czechia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 HC Dukla Jihlava U20 USHL-Style-Czech 9 3 0 3 0.333 0.1029 0.1029 0.3560 0.3560
2021-22 HC Dukla Jihlava U20 USHL-Style-Czech 43 20 22 42 0.977 0.3016 0.2869 1.0431 0.9922
2022-23 WB/Scranton Knights NCDC 43 11 9 20 0.465 0.1896 0.1822 0.3738 0.3593
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Castleton D3 LittleEast GR 25 8 6 14 0.560
2024-25 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 24 5 3 8 0.333
2023-24 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 25 6 11 17 0.680
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2023-24 · Castleton
+254.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16590
Forward overall
#870
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2015-16
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Colby · 2018-19
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2011-12
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.