IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vladislav Pshenichnikov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-18 Country: Russia
Signed Professionally
Avtomobilist Yekaterinburg · KHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 — USPHL-Premier 23 16 15 31 1.348 0.1763 0.1763 0.4574 0.4574
2021-22 Avto Yekaterinburg MHL-RU 49 13 13 26 0.531 0.2699 0.2560 1.4217 1.3483
2022-23 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 49 20 22 42 0.857 0.3494 0.3304 0.6889 0.6515
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 24 5 7 12 0.500
2023-24 Utica D3 UCHC — 25 4 7 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2023-24 · Utica
+71.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7185
Forward overall
#332
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Francone
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Menzies
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Henri Spoof
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.