IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marcus Torgner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-11-21 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 44 10 10 20 0.455 0.0513 0.0544 0.1546 0.1638
2022-23 Express Hockey Club EHL 42 11 8 19 0.452 0.0662 0.0688 0.2218 0.2306
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 17 0 2 2 0.118
2024-25 Southern Maine D3 NEHC SO 20 4 4 8 0.400
2023-24 Southern Maine D3 NEHC FR 19 2 5 7 0.368
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2023-24 · Southern Maine
+582.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
22%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35599
Forward overall
#2189
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeremy DeFazio
SUNY Brockport · 2010-11
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Graham Yeo
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2011-12
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Eddie Effinger
Amherst · 2006-07
0.536 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.