← New Search ↗ Social Card

Julien Jacob Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-07-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 53 0 19 19 0.358 0.0879 0.0879 0.2454 0.2454
2021-22 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 27 1 18 19 0.704 0.1725 0.1689 0.4817 0.4715
2022-23 Wellington Dukes OJHL 53 8 48 56 1.057 0.2590 0.2403 0.7232 0.6709
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Adrian D3 NCHA GR 27 2 10 12 0.444
2024-25 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 21 1 8 9 0.429
2023-24 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 30 2 7 9 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2023-24 · Adrian
+50.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3106
Defenseman overall
#837
Defenseman born in 2002
#550
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2006-07
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2016-17
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2011-12
0.815 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.