IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Hull Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1987-05-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Huntsville Otters OJHL 20 1 1 2 0.100 0.0300 0.0287 0.0684 0.0654
2007-08 Quinte West Pack OJHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 23 3 1 4 0.174
2024-25 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 23 3 1 4 0.174
2023-24 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 23 3 1 4 0.174
2022-23 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 23 3 1 4 0.174
2021-22 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 23 3 1 4 0.174
2020-21 Western Michigan ACHA_D1 — — 23 3 1 4 0.174
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2020-21 · Western Michigan
+541.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29621
Defenseman overall
#2036
Defenseman born in 1987
#5942
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.09 No data
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Doc Gentzler
SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Philip Schader
Finlandia · 2017-18
0.087 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kieran Furlonger
Fredonia · 2018-19
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.