IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Brzezicki Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 49 2 5 7 0.143 0.0583 0.0583 0.1149 0.1149
2020-21 — USPHL-Premier 37 5 14 19 0.513 0.0672 0.0672 0.1743 0.1743
2021-22 Wisconsin Rapids Riverkings USPHL-Premier 41 17 12 29 0.707 0.0925 0.0903 0.2401 0.2343
2022-23 Hudson Havoc USPHL-Premier 43 18 19 37 0.861 0.1126 0.1043 0.2921 0.2707
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lawrence D3 NCHA GR 16 1 2 3 0.188
2024-25 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 11 1 1 2 0.182
2023-24 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 18 4 1 5 0.278
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2023-24 · Lawrence
+228.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22519
Forward overall
#1229
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Merritt
Buffalo State · 2005-06
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Clark
Adrian · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Strong
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2014-15
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.