← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Van Waterschoot Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Pickering Panthers OJHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Pickering Panthers OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 46 15 16 31 0.674 0.1652 0.1588 0.4613 0.4434
2022-23 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 50 11 26 37 0.740 0.1814 0.1651 0.5065 0.4609
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Norwich D3 LittleEast GR 29 9 22 31 1.069
2024-25 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 27 6 11 17 0.630
2023-24 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 10 2 2 4 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2023-24 · Norwich
+187.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26019
Forward overall
#1472
Forward born in 2002
#1250
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2018-19
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2012-13
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.