IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sky Solig Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Warroad USHS-MN 20 2 5 7 0.350 0.0443 0.0443 0.0850 0.0850
2020-21 Warroad USHS-MN 20 12 9 21 1.050 0.1329 0.1329 0.2550 0.2550
2021-22 Gillette Wild NA3HL 36 22 24 46 1.278 0.1604 0.1583 0.4034 0.3981
2022-23 Gillette Wild NA3HL 40 30 31 61 1.525 0.1914 0.1802 0.4814 0.4533
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Beloit D3 WIAC JR 17 2 2 4 0.235
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2025-26 · Beloit
+60.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14582
Forward overall
#736
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bobby Hineman
Adrian · 2006-07
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy McGlynn
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2017-18
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Lavery
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2024-25
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.