IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Harris Hilfiker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-11-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Jersey Shore Whalers USPHL-Premier 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Nepean Raiders CCHL 47 2 6 8 0.170 0.0369 0.0367 0.1318 0.1311
2022-23 Nepean Raiders CCHL 49 0 9 9 0.184 0.0398 0.0378 0.1422 0.1351
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Norwich D3 LittleEast GR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 12 0 3 3 0.250
2023-24 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 12 0 4 4 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2023-24 · Norwich
+844.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24682
Defenseman overall
#3707
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeremy DeFazio
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Marit
Concordia (WI) · 2013-14
0.176 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Such
St. Mary's · 2006-07
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.