← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Halecki Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Pingree NE-Prep 26 0 1 1 0.038 0.0076 0.0076 0.0175 0.0175
2019-20 Tabor NE-Prep 28 5 8 13 0.464 0.0920 0.0920 0.2115 0.2115
2020-21 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 14 2 4 6 0.429 0.0990 0.0990 0.2097 0.2097
2021-22 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 45 15 28 43 0.956 0.2207 0.2233 0.4676 0.4732
2022-23 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 44 21 19 40 0.909 0.2100 0.2016 0.4448 0.4270
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nazareth D3 UCHC GR 26 8 8 16 0.615
2024-25 Nazareth D3 UCHC SR 22 5 1 6 0.273
2023-24 Nazareth D3 UCHC JR 16 0 4 4 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2023-24 · Nazareth
+38.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17589
Forward overall
#927
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.650 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.