IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bjorn Lervick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-07-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Benilde-St. Margaret's USHS-MN 21 0 3 3 0.143 0.0176 0.0176 0.0347 0.0347
2021-22 Benilde-St. Margaret's USHS-MN 27 1 7 8 0.296 0.0365 0.0365 0.0720 0.0720
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 21 1 3 4 0.191
2024-25 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 24 0 2 2 0.083
2023-24 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 17 1 2 3 0.176
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2023-24 · St. Olaf
+546.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
65%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23498
Defenseman overall
#3774
Defenseman born in 2003
#5290
in USHS-MN

D1 Comparables

Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Lukas Buchta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eamonn Miller
Salem State · 2016-17
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Robbie Roche
Assumption · 2015-16
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Bukowski
Augsburg · 2005-06
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.