← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joshua Kingsbury Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-05-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Kirkland Lake Gold Miners NOJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 French River Rapids NOJHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0178 0.0178 0.0519 0.0519
2021-22 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Premier 43 2 24 26 0.605 0.0682 0.0670 0.2057 0.2021
2022-23 Potomac Patriots USPHL-Premier 43 1 34 35 0.814 0.0918 0.0857 0.2769 0.2585
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western New England D3 CNE JR 22 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Western New England D3 CNE 15 0 1 1 0.067
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2024-25 · Western New England
-9.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4720
Defenseman overall
#1236
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2007-08
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2000-01
1.143 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2006-07
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.