← New Search ↗ Social Card

Wyatt Noble Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-07-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Spring Lake Park/Coon Rapids USHS-MN 26 3 7 10 0.385 0.0487 0.0487 0.0934 0.0934
2020-21 Spring Lake Park/Coon Rapids USHS-MN 19 1 6 7 0.368 0.0466 0.0466 0.0895 0.0895
2021-22 NA3HL 39 3 10 13 0.333 0.0418 0.0413 0.1052 0.1040
2022-23 Sheridan Hawks NA3HL 46 9 33 42 0.913 0.1146 0.1081 0.2882 0.2719
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Post D2 NE10 GR 15 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Post D2 NE10 SR 19 1 1 2 0.105
2023-24 Post D2 NE10 JR 27 0 2 2 0.074
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2023-24 · Post
-3.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11610
Defenseman overall
#2358
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Potsdam · 2021-22
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2011-12
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2016-17
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.