IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Greg Carey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-04-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Burlington Cougars OJHL 46 10 12 22 0.478 0.1437 0.1514 0.3274 0.3451
2008-09 Burlington Cougars OJHL 45 31 34 65 1.444 0.4339 0.4350 0.9887 0.9913
2009-10 Burlington Cougars OJHL 48 72 42 114 2.375 0.7135 0.6779 1.6257 1.5446
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SR 38 18 39 57 1.500
2012-13 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC JR 38 28 23 51 1.342
2011-12 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC SO 36 15 22 37 1.028
2010-11 St. Lawrence D1 ECAC FR 40 23 17 40 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.54
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2010-11 · St. Lawrence
+85.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5604
Forward overall
#260
Forward born in 1990
#33
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Luc Gerdes
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Vecchione
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Sam Anas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Elite
NCAAe PPG
J.T. Stenglein
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Michigan (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.61 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Novak
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Geordan Buffoline
New England · 2018-19
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Miller
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Hudson
Manhattanville · 2007-08
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.