IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luc Fricchione Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-12-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Elite 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Elite 44 12 32 44 1.000 0.0930 0.0930 0.2290 0.2290
2021-22 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier 44 1 18 19 0.432 0.0567 0.0573 0.1466 0.1483
2022-23 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier 40 6 24 30 0.750 0.0984 0.0947 0.2546 0.2449
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 22 0 3 3 0.136
2023-24 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 19 0 1 1 0.053
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2023-24 · Worcester State
-30.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7139
Defenseman overall
#1714
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Peter Karavos
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2015-16
0.586 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Bradshaw
St. Norbert · 2011-12
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Cessna
Fredonia · 2013-14
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.