IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Trowt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Winchendon NE-Prep 26 3 0 3 0.115 0.0223 0.0223 0.0528 0.0528
2021-22 Hampton Roads Whalers USPHL-Premier 44 3 8 11 0.250 0.0282 0.0273 0.0851 0.0825
2022-23 Springfield Jr. Pics USPHL-Premier 43 21 35 56 1.302 0.1469 0.1352 0.4430 0.4077
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC GR 6 1 0 1 0.167
2024-25 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC JR 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23917
Forward overall
#1328
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Backman
Plymouth State · 2016-17
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Faulkner
Hobart · 2016-17
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Bernhardson
Concordia · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.