IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Hassell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-05-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 New Hampshire Avalanche EHLP 38 2 10 12 0.316 0.0205 0.0205 0.0711 0.0711
2020-21 New Hampshire Avalanche EHLP 33 6 20 26 0.788 0.0512 0.0512 0.1774 0.1774
2021-22 New Hampshire Avalanche EHLP 39 7 16 23 0.590 0.0383 0.0366 0.1328 0.1267
2022-23 — EHL 18 1 0 1 0.056 0.0081 0.0078 0.0273 0.0263
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Framingham State D3 MASCAC GR 25 0 2 2 0.080
2024-25 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Framingham State D3 MASCAC JR 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20700
Defenseman overall
#3345
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Briola
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2010-11
0.080 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Charlie Pelnik
SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Paradise
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
0.091 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.