IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Hodowanec Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-01-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Boston Dukes EHL 27 0 5 5 0.185 0.0428 0.0485 0.0906 0.1027
2019-20 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 13 0 1 1 0.077 0.0101 0.0101 0.0261 0.0261
2021-22 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs USPHL-Premier 43 4 12 16 0.372 0.0487 0.0471 0.1263 0.1221
2022-23 New Jersey Rockets USPHL-Premier 41 0 10 10 0.244 0.0319 0.0293 0.0828 0.0760
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arcadia D3 MAC GR 17 0 1 1 0.059
2024-25 Arcadia D3 MAC SR 16 1 1 2 0.125
2023-24 Arcadia D3 MAC JR 15 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20210
Defenseman overall
#3306
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sam MacBean
Hamilton · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnny Thrasher
Beloit · 2024-25
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick White
Fitchburg State · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.