IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dallas D'Amato Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 18 2 3 5 0.278 0.0406 0.0406 0.1362 0.1362
2021-22 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 44 18 36 54 1.227 0.1796 0.1808 0.6017 0.6057
2022-23 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 46 20 33 53 1.152 0.1686 0.1609 0.5649 0.5392
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC GR 9 2 0 2 0.222
2024-25 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SR 15 0 2 2 0.133
2023-24 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC JR 15 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12064
Forward overall
#594
Forward born in 2002
#162
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tim Murphy
UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Mortson
UMass Boston · 2022-23
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kelvin Walz
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2013-14
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.