IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Quigley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-08-26 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2025-26: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2025 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier 25 3 18 21 0.840 0.2769 0.2908 0.2858 0.3002
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 26 4 9 13 0.500
2024-25 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 23 4 7 11 0.478
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2024-25 · Worcester State
+74.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8220
Defenseman overall
#1895
Defenseman born in 2005
#2607
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Michael Kapla
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Renouf
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Ruslan Pedan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Lenaghan
Becker · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Stephen Collins
SUNY Geneseo · 2009-10
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Suede
Adrian · 2018-19
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.