IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Houser Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Belmont Hill NE-Prep 30 0 3 3 0.100 0.0198 0.0198 0.0456 0.0456
2021-22 Belmont Hill NE-Prep 23 2 8 10 0.435 0.0861 0.0861 0.1981 0.1981
2022-23 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 42 10 7 17 0.405 0.1650 0.1624 0.3254 0.3203
2023-24 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 48 18 24 42 0.875 0.3567 0.3308 0.7033 0.6523
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 17 5 2 7 0.412
2024-25 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC — 22 2 4 6 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2024-25 · Connecticut College
+20.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12106
Forward overall
#561
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Logan Gallagher
King's · 2022-23
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Francone
Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kerfalla Touré
Elmira · 2021-22
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.