IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Hall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Navan Grads CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Navan Grads CCHL 55 8 25 33 0.600 0.1301 0.1315 0.4645 0.4694
2022-23 Navan Grads CCHL 55 19 24 43 0.782 0.1696 0.1638 0.6052 0.5845
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 19 2 3 5 0.263
2024-25 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 13 1 2 3 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2024-25 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+78.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24346
Forward overall
#1345
Forward born in 2003
#502
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tim Murphy
UMass Boston · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Rick Varone
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
0.652 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Laplante
New England College · 2017-18
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.